Evidently, the author of that 1864 law was also a rampant, raging pedo.
I am reminded that Alito's "justification" for ignoring stare decisis and overturning Roe in Dobbs, was the legal opinion of a *British* judge from the 17th C. who believed women were chattel property and literally believed in witches flying on broomsticks, and who obviously had no possible relevance to American jurisprudence. I mean, what's next? Why not go back to the 13th C. and bring back judicial duelling?
Evidently, the author of that 1864 law was also a rampant, raging pedo.
I am reminded that Alito's "justification" for ignoring stare decisis and overturning Roe in Dobbs, was the legal opinion of a *British* judge from the 17th C. who believed women were chattel property and literally believed in witches flying on broomsticks, and who obviously had no possible relevance to American jurisprudence. I mean, what's next? Why not go back to the 13th C. and bring back judicial duelling?
Pistols at 20 paces? 🤷🏻♂️🙄
I'm a sword man myself.