I think you hit the nail on the head there for me. This binary parallax righteousness seems to be an effort of minimalistic journalism, as opposed to integrity. I’ve always thought the most powerful question is why? Motive, intent, who’s to gain first and foremost? Is it FACE, or Evil Good Boy Do Fine? Pun intended. Again, I love what your singing. TWANG!!
For Conservatives, it's all one big game of "King of the Hill." They want to be the ones on top, and they'll do anything- no matter how cheap, dirty, underhanded, and/or classless- to get there and stay there. As the man said, "It's pretty fuckin' stupid."
One of the things I've noticed as that once these clowns (Weiss, Jordan Peterson, others) who spew about free speech launch into their own platforms they become completely unhinged. It is a kind of "Red Queen Gambit" where they are now in this blood competition with others of their ilk to see who can be the more absurd. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Red_Queen_hypothesis
I think you hit the nail on the head there for me. This binary parallax righteousness seems to be an effort of minimalistic journalism, as opposed to integrity. I’ve always thought the most powerful question is why? Motive, intent, who’s to gain first and foremost? Is it FACE, or Evil Good Boy Do Fine? Pun intended. Again, I love what your singing. TWANG!!
For Conservatives, it's all one big game of "King of the Hill." They want to be the ones on top, and they'll do anything- no matter how cheap, dirty, underhanded, and/or classless- to get there and stay there. As the man said, "It's pretty fuckin' stupid."
One of the things I've noticed as that once these clowns (Weiss, Jordan Peterson, others) who spew about free speech launch into their own platforms they become completely unhinged. It is a kind of "Red Queen Gambit" where they are now in this blood competition with others of their ilk to see who can be the more absurd. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Red_Queen_hypothesis
And there seems to be no guardrails on their absurdity.